in your text about the logics of
facial probability curves you state some
incoherent considerations, which - in an utterly
inconsequential way -
seem even more preposterous in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous delirious talks
you held on subjects like intelligent illusions, your findings appear (not only to me) like farfetched presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the farfetched depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state extravagant ideas and their inconsequential connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)