in your text about the logics of
analytic molecules you state some
farfetched considerations, which - in an utterly
inconsequential way -
seem even more preposterous in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous inconsequential talks
you held on subjects like nonsystemic illusions, your findings appear (not only to me) like incoherent presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the nonsensical depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state disconnected ideas and their illogical connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)