in your text about the logics of
existential entropy you state some
delirious considerations, which - in an utterly
delirious way -
seem even more farfetched in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous preposterous talks
you held on subjects like optocoupled conjectures, your findings appear (not only to me) like disconnected presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the nonsensical depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state exorbitant ideas and their incoherent connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)