in your text about the logics of
folded magnetism you state some
inconsequential considerations, which - in an utterly
delirious way -
seem even more exorbitant in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous illogical talks
you held on subjects like systematic experimentation, your findings appear (not only to me) like illogical presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the incoherent depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state absurd ideas and their nonsensical connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)