in your text about the logics of
finite genes you state some
skimble-skamble considerations, which - in an utterly
incoherent way -
seem even more inconsequential in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous senseless talks
you held on subjects like conditioned qualia, your findings appear (not only to me) like nonsensical presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the nonsensical depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state delirious ideas and their inconsequential connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)