in your text about the logics of
conducted paradoxes you state some
delirious considerations, which - in an utterly
farfetched way -
seem even more incoherent in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous exorbitant talks
you held on subjects like complex environments, your findings appear (not only to me) like absurd presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the delirious depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state senseless ideas and their skimble-skamble connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)