in your text about the logics of
explorational magnetism you state some
farfetched considerations, which - in an utterly
incoherent way -
seem even more farfetched in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous incoherent talks
you held on subjects like nonsystemic probabilities, your findings appear (not only to me) like farfetched presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the absurd depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state inconsequential ideas and their nonsensical connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)