in your text about the logics of
associative emphasis you state some
delirious considerations, which - in an utterly
nonsensical way -
seem even more illogical in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous nonsensical talks
you held on subjects like facial computations, your findings appear (not only to me) like nonsensical presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the inconsequential depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state inconsequential ideas and their incoherent connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)