in your text about the logics of
distributive mechanics you state some
inconsequential considerations, which - in an utterly
absurd way -
seem even more skimble-skamble in regard to proper scientific strategies. i say this because, in all previous farfetched talks
you held on subjects like learning catalysts, your findings appear (not only to me) like nonsensical presumptions with no substance.
but if your goal is the nonsensical depiction of certain fields of research, carry on to state senseless ideas and their absurd connectivities.
(bold text is generated randomly via the keyword-script
developed by christian stefaner-schmid for pseudo-intelligence,
a subfield of stefaner-schmids artistic and scientific research)
|| page refreshes every 30 seconds ||
"just mean" is inspired by umberto ecos text on
"The Irrational Yesterday and Today" in
[Sugli specchi e altri saggi](Eco 1987)